Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency

In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 984--989 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Role of terms in popular science text.F. U. Zhabbarova - 2013 - Liberal Arts in Russia 2 (2):195--202.
Writing Successful Academic Books.Anthony Haynes - 1989 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Problems with electoral evaluations of expert opinions.Roy A. Sorensen - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (1):47-53.
The future of European cohesion.Emilio Fontela - 1994 - AI and Society 8 (2):123-130.
Epistemological Expertise and the Problem of Epistemic Assessment.James McBain - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):125-133.
What kind of expert should a system be?Paul E. Johnson - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (1):77-97.
Thinking as Writing.Hans Sluga - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 33 (1):115-141.
Strong Evaluations and Personal Identity.Arto Laitinen - 2002 - In Christian Kanzian & et al (eds.), Persons: An Interdisciplinary Approach. ALWS Society. pp. 127-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
52 (#292,437)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Paragraphs.[author unknown] - 1898 - The Classical Review 12 (8):381-382.

Add more references