Bradley's utilitarian theory of punishment

Ethics 86 (3):200-213 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although f h bradley is usually taken to be a retributivist, His writings on the topic of punishment show his position to be more utilitarian. And he criticizes retributivism severely in his article in the "international journal of ethics" in 1894. The present paper attempts to present a more accurate picture of bradley's views of punishment and to show the relevance of these views to contemporary debate on the justification and distribution of punishment

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Making sense of retributivism.J. Angelo Corlett - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
The Rise and Fall of the Mixed Theory of Punishment.Whitley Kaufman - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):37-57.
Punishment: Consequentialism.David Wood - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
A utilitarian reply to dr. McCloskey.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):264 – 291.
A non-utilitarian approach to punishment.H. J. McCloskey - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):249 – 263.
Punishing the innocent — unintentionally.Alan Wertheimer - 1977 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (1-4):45 – 65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#344,726)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references