Books Articles Review s Papers presented

Abstract

This is the first volume of an impressive project on the relation of art, philosophy and social change. In an on-going argument and review ing several important aesthetic theories Paul Crow ther in this book argues for the idea that aesthetics should be a kind of critical assessment of art w orks' experiential consequences. Although I go along w ith his resistance against postmodernist reasoning, w hich functions as the starting point of his book, beyond that, our w ays often part. My disagreement, how ever, does not annul the evident quality of the argument in this w ork. It is recommended reading material for all those aestheticians w ho are interested in the cognitive and non-cognitive functionality of art w orks and in the possibility of any influence of art on societal change. I w ill now discuss the most crucial steps in Crow ther's argument. Postmodernists claim to have undone the alleged rigidity of modern categories, like that of the autonomous subject, but according to Crow ther they reach this `achievement' by overemphasizing the fluidity of modes of know ledge and experience, and of their status as social constructs, but there may w ell exist flexible constants. Aesthetics can help w ith the analysis of these flexible constants, not by looking for the essences of art or aesthetic experience, but by supplementing our theoretical assessments w ith a critique of art. Crow ther proposes to view aesthetic experiences as w ell as w orks of art as functions of critical aw areness and of body-hold, an historicized version of Merleau-Ponty's much neglected notion of embodiment. Critical aesthetics actualizes the critical aw areness involved in our aesthetic experiences. Art, defined in terms of originality, roots in the body-hold of the artist, w ho moulds his medium to solve technical problems traditional art forms confront him w ith. Postmodernism involves only tw o theses, really. First, contemporary experience and sensibility are analyzed as imbued by the shocks generated by the rapid succession of mechanically reproduced events..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Critical aesthetics and postmodernism.Paul Crowther - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Aesthetics.Harold Osborne - 1972 - London,: Oxford University Press.
The nature of art.Antony L. Cothey - 1990 - New York: Routledge.
Art, Self and Knowledge.Keith Lehrer - 2011 - , US: Oxford University Press.
Ideas about art.Kathleen Kadon Desmond - 2011 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
A Portrait of the Artist as an Aesthetic Expert.Christy Mag Uidhir & Cameron Buckner - 2014 - In Gregory Currie, Matthew Kieran & Aaron Meskin (eds.), Aesthetics and the Sciences. Oxford University Press.
Aesthetics.Susan L. Feagin & Patrick Maynard (eds.) - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The art of seeing: an interpretation of the aesthetic encounter.Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi - 1990 - Los Angeles, Calif.: Getty Center for Education in the Arts. Edited by Rick Emery Robinson.
How a Map Works in the Land Arts.Sukyung Chung - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 12:9-17.
Art and aesthetics at work.Adrian Carr & Philip Hancock (eds.) - 2003 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
The aesthetic appreciation of nature.Malcolm Budd - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3):207-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-24

Downloads
41 (#379,234)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mind and World.Huw Price & John McDowell - 1994 - Philosophical Books 38 (3):169-181.
Mind and World.John Mcdowell - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):99-109.
Languages of Art.Nelson Goodman - 1970 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (1):62-63.

View all 28 references / Add more references