BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):69 (2018)

Authors
Alan Cribb
Victoria University of Manchester
Abstract
This commentary welcomes the work of Ives et al. on Standards of practice in Empirical Bioethics, and especially the dialogical spirit in which the standards have been constructed and offered. It also raises some questions about the consistent interpretation and use of such standards.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/s12910-018-0303-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What ‘Empirical Turn in Bioethics’?Samia Hurst - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (8):439-444.
Standards and Professional Practice: The TTA and Initial Teacher Training.Margaret Reynolds - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (3):247 - 260.
Standards, Double Standards and No Standards.Beuy Joob & Viroj Wiwanitkit - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):265-265.
Epistemic Standards: High Hopes and Low Expectations.Erik Stei - 2016 - In Pedro Schmechtig & Martin Grajner (eds.), Epistemic Reasons, Norms, and Goals. De Gruyter. pp. 185-198.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-06

Total views
19 ( #582,562 of 2,508,046 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,508,046 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes