Human Nature 19 (3):249-262 (2008)

Cooperative child care among humans, where individuals other than the biological mother (allomothers) provide care, may increase a mother’s fertility and the survivorship of her children. Although the potential benefits to the mother are clear, the motivations for allomothers to provide care are less clear. Here, we evaluate the kin selection allomothering hypothesis using observations on Hadza hunter-gatherers collected in ten camps over 17 months. Our results indicate that related allomothers spend the largest percentage of time holding children. The higher the degree of relatedness among kin, the more time they spend holding, supporting the hypothesis of nepotism as the strongest motivation for providing allomaternal care. Unrelated helpers of all ages also provide a substantial amount of investment, which may be motivated by learning to mother, reciprocity, or coercion
Keywords Allomothers  Child care  Cooperative breeding  Hadza  Hunter-gatherers  Kin selection
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12110-008-9043-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hadza Cooperation.Frank W. Marlowe - 2009 - Human Nature 20 (4):417-430.
Who Responds to Crying?Ann Cale Kruger & Melvin Konner - 2010 - Human Nature 21 (3):309-329.


Added to PP index

Total views
20 ( #555,203 of 2,499,227 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,227 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes