Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work: Edited and with an Introduction by Richard Creath

University of California Press (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rudolf Carnap and W. V. Quine, two of the twentieth century's most important philosophers, corresponded at length—and over a long period of time—on matters personal, professional, and philosophical. Their friendship encompassed issues and disagreements that go to the heart of contemporary philosophic discussions. Carnap was a founder and leader of the logical positivist school. The younger Quine began as his staunch admirer but diverged from him increasingly over questions in the analysis of meaning and the justification of belief. That they remained close, relishing their differences through years of correspondence, shows their stature both as thinkers and as friends. The letters are presented here, in full, for the first time. The substantial introduction by Richard Creath offers a lively overview of Carnap's and Quine's careers and backgrounds, allowing the nonspecialist to see their writings in historical and intellectual perspective. Creath also provides a judicious analysis of the philosophical divide between them, showing how deep the issues cut into the discipline, and how to a large extent they remain unresolved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,912

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Every dogma has its day.Richard Creath - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):347-389.
The logical and the analytic.Richard Creath - 2017 - Synthese 194 (1):79-96.
On Quine on Carnap on Ontology.Marc Alspector-Kelly - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 102 (1):93 - 122.
‘‘Quine’s Evolution from ‘Carnap’s Disciple’ to the Author of “Two Dogmas.Greg Frost-Arnold - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):291-316.
Dear Carnap, Dear Van. W. V. Quine and Rudolf Carnap. [REVIEW]Thomas Uebel - 1993 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 1:251-254.
The Cambridge Companion to Carnap.James Justus - 2009 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 15 (4):428-431.
Empirical equivalence in the Quine-Carnap debate.Eric J. Loomis - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.
Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism.Richard Creath (ed.) - 2012 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.
Putting the bite back into 'Two Dogmas'.Paul Gregory - 2003 - Principia 7 (1-2):115-129.
Carnap and Quine on Empiricism.Robert Almeder - 1997 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (3):349 - 364.
‘Two Dogmas’ -- All Bark and No Bite?: Carnap and Quine on Analyticity.Paul A. Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-22

Downloads
35 (#347,937)

6 months
12 (#94,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Carnap's Metaontology.Matti Eklund - 2013 - Noûs 47 (2):229-249.
Carnapian frameworks.Gabriel L. Broughton - 2021 - Synthese 199 (1-2):4097-4126.
Epistemology in the Aufbau.Michael Friedman - 1992 - Synthese 93 (1-2):15 - 57.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references