Neuroethics 12 (2):183-199 (2019)

Authors
Kelso Cratsley
American University
Abstract
The field of mental health continues to struggle with the question of how best to structure its diagnostic systems. This issue is of considerable ethical importance, but the implications for public health approaches to mental health have yet to be explored in any detail. In this article I offer a preliminary treatment, drawing out several core issues while sounding a note of caution. A central strand of the debates over diagnosis has been the contrast between categorical and dimensional models, with renewed attention due to recent publication of the DSM-5, launch of the RDoC, and ongoing work on the ICD-11. This dispute involves an interesting assortment of ethical and empirical considerations, many with direct relevance for public health. It has been proposed, for example, that dimensional diagnosis may be morally preferable because it can help reduce the stigma associated with mental disorder. This is a pressing concern, as preventive strategies are expanded in mental health, often operating under dimensional assumptions that target various risk factors. But this type of proposal relies upon an empirical claim and the scientific status of dimensionality remains unresolved, including its relation to stigma. I suggest, then, that the current state of the evidence does not yet warrant clear adjudication between competing frameworks, and thus any implications for public mental health remain highly provisional. More research is needed to help resolve these issues, including ethical analysis.
Keywords mental health  psychiatry  dimensionality  diagnosis  DSM  ICD-11  RDoC
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-018-9390-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Public Mental Health and Prevention.Jennifer Radden - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (2):126-138.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Values and Psychiatric Diagnosis.John Z. Sadler - 2004 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-10-20

Total views
60 ( #188,020 of 2,498,180 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,180 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes