Species Concepts and Natural Goodness

In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & Matthew H. Slater (eds.), Carving Nature at its Joints: Natural Kinds in Metaphysics and Science. MIT Press. pp. 289 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter defends a pluralist understanding of species on which a normative species concept is viable and can support natural goodness evaluations. The central question here is thus: Since organisms are to be evaluated as members of their species, how does a proper understanding of species affect the feasibility of natural goodness evaluations? Philippa Foot has argued for a form of natural goodness evaluation in which living things are evaluated by how well fitted they are for flourishing as members of their species, in ways characteristic of their species. She has further argued that assessments of moral goodness in humans are of the same evaluative form. However, natural goodness evaluations and, by extension, the natural goodness approach, do not garner justification in virtue of employing a scientifically privileged conception of species. The natural goodness approach is only justified given particular metaethical and normative commitments that are independent of naturalism, since the approach does not depend upon naturalism alone.

Similar books and articles

On the failure of modern species concepts.Jody Hey - 2006 - Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21 (8):447-450.
Species pluralism does not imply species eliminativism.Ingo Brigandt - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1305-1316.
The cladistic solution to the species problem.Mark Ridley - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):1-16.
On the metaphysics of species.Judith K. Crane - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (2):156-173.
Natural Theology In an Ecological Mode.Mark Wynn - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):27-42.
What is a species?Martin Mahner - 1993 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):103 - 126.
What Is a Species? A Contribution to the Never Ending Species Debate in Biology.Martin Mahner - 1993 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):103 - 126.
Order and the Determinate.Christopher V. Mirus - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 65 (3):499-523.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
456 (#36,887)

6 months
110 (#28,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Ronald Sandler
Northeastern University
Judith Crane
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

Citations of this work

The good of non-sentient entities: Organisms, artifacts, and synthetic biology.John Basl & Ronald Sandler - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):697-705.
Power-ing up neo-aristotelian natural goodness.Ben Page - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3755-3775.
Natural, Artifactual, and Moral Goodness.Judith K. Crane & Ronald Sandler - 2017 - The Journal of Ethics 21 (3):291-307.
Blurring nature at its boundaries. Vague phenomena in current stem cell debate.Martin Hähnel - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (3):373-381.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references