Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):381-406 (2008)

Authors
Carl F. Craver
Washington University in St. Louis
Abstract
We argue that neuroeconomics should be a mechanistic science. We defend this view as preferable both to a revolutionary perspective, according to which classical economics is eliminated in favour of neuroeconomics, and to a classical economic perspective, according to which economics is insulated from facts about psychology and neuroscience. We argue that, like other mechanistic sciences, neuroeconomics will earn its keep to the extent that it either reconfigures how economists think about decision-making or how neuroscientists think about brain mechanisms underlying behaviour. We discuss some ways that the search for mechanisms can bring about such top-down and bottom-up revision, and we consider some examples from the recent neuroeconomics literature of how varieties of progress of this sort might be achieved.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0266267108002034
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,307
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 48 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Functionalism and the Role of Psychology in Economics.Christopher Clarke - 2020 - Journal of Economic Methodology 27 (4):292-310.
Preferences and Positivist Methodology in Economics.Christopher Clarke - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (2):192-212.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neuroeconomics: More Than Inspiration, Less Than Revolution.N. Emrah Aydinonat - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):159-169.
Decision-Making: A Neuroeconomic Perspective.Benoit Hardy-Vallée - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (6):939–953.
Neuroeconomics and Confirmation Theory.Christopher Clarke - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (2):195-215.
Explaining the Brain.Carl F. Craver - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Neuroeconomics Studies.Jang Woo Park & Paul J. Zak - 2007 - Analyse & Kritik 29 (1):47-59.
Prospecting Neuroeconomics.Andreas Ortmann - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):431-448.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
120 ( #97,556 of 2,507,710 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,820 of 2,507,710 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes