Facts, Lies, and Videotapes: The Permanent Vegetative State and the Sad Case of Terri Schiavo

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):363-371 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Right to die legal cases in the United States have evolved over the last 25 years, beginning with the Karen Quinlan case in 1975. Different substantive and procedural issues have been raised in these cases, and society's thinking has changed as a result of the far more complex legal issues that appear today as opposed to the simplistic views raised in early landmark cases. Many of the early cases involved patients in a vegetative state, but more recently patients who were in a minimally conscious state have been the center of attention. Early cases involved the withdrawal of respirators and other sophisticated technology, but later cases centered on the withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration, and even whether it was permissible for competent patients to stop eating and drinking in a normal manner. Initial cases pitted families who argued for withdrawal of treatment, usually against the attending physicians and hospitals and/or the state or federal government, who argued for continuation of treatment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Learning to Cope with Ambiguity.Brad F. Mellon - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):291-297.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
24 (#642,030)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?