Religious Studies 34 (2):177-188 (1998)

Authors
William Lane Craig
Houston Baptist University
Abstract
God is conceived in the Western theistic tradition to be both the Creator and Conservor of the universe. These two roles were typically classed as different aspects of creation, originating creation and continuing creation. On pain of incoherence, however, conservation needs to be distinguished from creation. Contrary to current analyses (such as Philip Quinn's), creation should be explicated in terms of God's bringing something into being, while conservation should be understood in terms of God's preservation of something over an interval of time. The crucial difference is that while conservation presupposes an object of the divine action, creation does not. Such a construal has significant implications for a tensed theory of time
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412598004326
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The World’s Continuance: Divine Conservation or Existential Inertia?John Beaudoin - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):83 - 98.
Wherein Lies the Debate? Concerning Whether God is a Person.Ben Page - 2019 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 85 (3):297-317.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
71 ( #161,880 of 2,505,611 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,611 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes