Routledge (2019)

Authors
Christopher Cowie
Cambridge University
Abstract
The Repugnant Conclusion is a controversial theorem about population size. It states that a sufficiently large population of lives that are barely worth living is better than a smaller population of high quality lives. This is highly counter-intuitive. It implies that we can improve the world by trading quality of life for quantity of lives. Can it be defended? Christopher Cowie explores these questions and unpacks the controversies surrounding the Repugnant Conclusion. He focuses on whether the truth of the Repugnant Conclusion turns - as some have claimed - on the uncomfortable claim that many people's lives are actually bad for them and that even privileged people lead lives that are only just worth living. Highly recommended for those interested in ethics, applied ethics and population studies The Repugnant Conclusion will also be of interest to those in related disciplines such as economics, development studies, politics and international relations.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Buy this book $34.95 used (42% off)   $51.03 new (15% off)   $59.80 from Amazon    Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9781138605442   9780429468117   1138605441
DOI 10.4324/9780429468117
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Does the Repugnant Conclusion Have Any Probative Force?Christopher Cowie - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (12):3021-3039.
In Defence of Repugnance.Michael Huemer - 2008 - Mind 117 (468):899-933.
Egalitarianism and Repugnant Conclusions.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2003 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 38 (1):115-125.
Perfectionism and the Repugnant Conclusion.Simon Beard - 2020 - Journal of Value Inquiry 54 (1):119-140.
Is the Repugnant Conclusion Repugnant?Jesper Ryberg - 1996 - Philosophical Papers 25 (3):161-177.
The Reverse Repugnant Conclusion.Tim Mulgan - 2002 - Utilitas 14 (3):360.
Repugnance or Intransitivity: A Repugnant But Forced Choice.Stuart Rachels - 2004 - In Jesper Ryberg Torbjorn Tannsjo (ed.), The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 163--86.
Repugnant Conclusion.Gustaf Arrhenius - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Resources and the Acceptability of the Repugnant Conclusion.Stephen J. Schmidt - forthcoming - Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-04-21

Total views
1 ( #1,552,166 of 2,518,450 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,450 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes