“Sounds Fine, But No Thanks!”: On Distinguishing Judgments About Action and Acceptability in Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):57-59 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,020

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Authenticity or Risk?Jonathan Livengood & Justin Sytsma - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (4):260-263.
“Lovedrugs” May Be a Moral Imperative.Vojin Rakić - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (4):244-245.
Love Drugs and Academic Myth.Tomislav Furlanis, Laura Duplaquet & Frederic Gilbert - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (4):253-255.
It Takes Two to Tango.Monique Lanoix - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (4):258-259.
Service and Status Competition May Help Explain Perceived Ethical Acceptability.Hugh Desmond - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):258-260.
Cognitive Enhancement: Toward a Rational Public Consensus.Eman Ahmed & Kristien Hens - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):263-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-10

Downloads
41 (#557,081)

6 months
6 (#915,561)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles