Why Jurisprudence Is Not Legal Philosophy

Jurisprudence 5 (1):41-55 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this article is to describe and defend jurisprudence as an enterprise of theorising about law that is distinct from what is now understood as legal philosophy in the Anglophone world. Jurisprudence must draw on legal philosophy but also from many other resources. It should be an open quest for juristically significant insights about law. Its purpose is to inform and guide the juristic task of making organised social regulation a valuable practice, rooted and effective in the specific contexts and historical conditions in which it exists but also aimed at serving demands for justice and security through regulation, as these perennial values are understood in their time and place, and as they might be further clarified and reconciled as legal ideals

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Normative jurisprudence: an introduction.Robin West - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jurisprudence, 2009-2010.David Brooke - 2009 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Legal philosophies.James W. Harris - 1997 - Dayton, Ohio: Lexis Nexis.
Socio-Legal Positivism and a General Jurisprudence.Brian Z. Tamanaha - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (1):1-32.
Law as a moral idea.Nigel Simmonds - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Legal rights.Pavlos Eleftheriadis - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-08

Downloads
40 (#389,966)

6 months
16 (#149,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Legal Positivism: 5½ Myths.John Gardner - 2001 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 46 (1):199-227.
What is jurisprudence?R. H. S. Tur - 1978 - Philosophical Quarterly 28 (111):149-161.

Add more references