Technology, Philosophy, and the Mastery of Nature: Leibniz' Critique of Cartesian Mechanics

Dissertation, The Catholic University of America (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The goal of the modern scientific project, as defined by such thinkers as Descartes and Bacon, is "mastery of nature." Martin Heidegger, in an interpretation of mastery of nature that has left its imprint on post-modern critique of science, maintains that the essence of modern science lies in a projection of "technological being" upon nature. This projective "assault" has its origin in the "self-grounding" project of modern metaphysics, in which the human subject attempts to secure a self-sufficient position over against all possible objects. ;The dissertation examines Heidegger's "technological thesis" from the vantage point of the history and philosophy of science. Adopting the vis viva debate between Leibniz and the Cartesians as a point of departure, it identifies and develops, historically and systematically, two themes upon which hinges the question of the technological essence of modern science and its relationship to the "self-grounding" project: the "rationalism" of modern science, and modern science's view of natural teleology. The main argument of the dissertation is that examination of the relationship between these two themes reveals the "teleology of reason" in modern science. ;Chapter's One and Two focus on Leibniz' disagreement with Descartes over the ontology of corporeal substance. From that discussion emerge our two metaphysical themes, which are addressed in Chapter's Three and Four respectively. On the basis of the results of those chapters it is argued that the problem of "mastery of nature" resides in a clash, indigenous to reason, between the intrinsic teleology of nature, through which nature is rendered intelligible to reason, and the teleology of reason itself, which is freedom. ;The conclusion shows that Heidegger ignores tendencies within science, and within the very self-grounding project itself, which run counter to his pessimistic portrayal of science as an "assault" upon nature. Finally, the prospect for a non-coercive resolution to the clash of teleologies in modern science through the "ravishing of nature" is considered

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heidegger's Philosophy of Science.Patricia Glazebrook - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Heidegger's Critique of Technology.Charles L. Betros - 1986 - Dissertation, Fordham University
On Kant's Philosophy of Natural Science.Wen-Sheng Wang - 2004 - Philosophy and Culture 31 (2):143-162.
Origin and Ordering: Aristotle, Heidegger, and the Production of Nature.Michael J. Monti - 1997 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Binghamton
Teleology Revived? Cooperation and the Ends of Nature.Simon Oliver - 2013 - Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (2):158-165.
The Permanent Limits of Modern Science—From Birth to Death.Eric Cohen - 2006 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 73 (3):785-804.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Kevin Cosgrove
Providence College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references