Surprisingly rational: Probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment

Psychological Review 121 (3):463-480 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comments on Quantum Probability Theory.Steven Sloman - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):47-52.
Assessing Uncertainty.Amos Tversky - 1974 - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 36 (2):148-159.
Bayesian probability.Patrick Maher - 2010 - Synthese 172 (1):119 - 127.
Noise matters: towards an ontology of noise.Greg Hainge - 2013 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
A progress report on the training of probability assessors.Marc Alpert & Howard Raiffa - 1982 - In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press. pp. 294--305.
Is quantum probability rational?Alasdair I. Houston & Karoline Wiesner - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):291 - 292.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
28 (#556,922)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?