Schopenhauer’s Interpretation of the Platonic Ideas

International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 14 (2):153-175 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A contentious feature in the thought of Arthur Schopenhauer is his account of the Platonic Ideas. This is no doubt evidenced by the scholarly literature where various difficulties have been identified in regards to this introduction, and often varying positions maintained. Within this essay, I offer a survey of the major debates surrounding this issue. Following this, I turn to a specific question related to Schopenhauer’s claim that his own account of the Platonic Ideas is authentic to the original views of Plato himself. I show that, excepting minor points of similarity, Schopenhauer’s account is quite inauthentic to that of Plato. Still more, drawing upon his distinction between abstract and intuitive knowledge, I offer an interpretation of the relationship between Genius and contemplation employing the concept of a “circle of signification”. Finally, I identify some difficulties in relation to Schopenhauer’s views.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,400

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Schopenhauer on Aesthetic Understanding and the Values of Art.Bart Vandenabeele - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):194-210.
A Companion to Schopenhauer.Bart Vandenabeele (ed.) - 2011 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Schopenhauer's Metaphysics of the Will.Gilbert L. Shepard - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Schopenhauer and Krausz on Objects of Interpretation.Arati Barua - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (1):33-37.


Added to PP

19 (#589,775)

6 months
3 (#227,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Costanzo
Conception Seminary College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references