Breaking Good: Moral Agency, Neuroethics, and the Spontaneity of Compassion

In Jake H. Davis (ed.), A Mirror is for Reflection: Understanding Buddhist Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 109-128 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper addresses two specific and related questions the Buddhist neuroethics program raises for our traditional understanding of Buddhist ethics: Does affective neuroscience supply enough evidence that contempla- tive practices such as compassion meditation can enhance normal cognitive functioning? Can such an account advance the philosophical debate concerning freedom and determinism in a profitable direction? In response to the first question, I argue that dispositions such as empathy and altruism can in effect be understood in terms of the mechanisms that regulate affective cognition. In response to the second question, I claim that moral agency is a type of achievement that comes with learning the norms of ethical con- duct, which are not tractable by specifically neurobiological mechanisms and processes (though, once learned, such norms would have their neural cor- relates when enacted)



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Cultivation of Virtue in Buddhist Ethics.Charles K. Fink - 2013 - Journal of Buddhist Ethics 20:667-701.
Buddhist ethics: A review essay. [REVIEW]Maria Heim - 2011 - Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (3):571-584.
On finding a home for agency.Richard N. Williams - 1994 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 14 (1):83-86.


Added to PP

118 (#107,235)

6 months
15 (#66,578)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christian Coseru
College of Charleston

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references