Understanding the Impact of the Animal Enterprise Terrorist Act (AETA) on Animal Advocacy

Environmental Ethics 39 (4):355-375 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In many contemporary societies, there is an increasing number of animal welfare sympathizers and activists. In the United States, particularly, there are various individuals who have engaged in activist activities focused on animals. However, since 2006, and under the Animal Enterprise Terrorist Act, some of these activities have been classified as terrorist crimes. Independent of whether such activities are morally justified or not, the AETA law exaggerates these activist actions and can take the shape of silencing and restricting forms of activism that contest the way animals are treated by enterprises.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Animal Activism of Henry Spira (1927-1998).Lyle Munro - 2002 - Society and Animals 10 (2):173-191.
The sciences of animal welfare.David J. Mellor - 2009 - Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Emily Patterson-Kane & Kevin J. Stafford.
Activism as Integrity. [REVIEW]Joel Marks - 2008 - Philosophy Now (67):44-45.
Just a dog: understanding animal cruelty and ourselves.Arnold Arluke - 2006 - Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Animal rights: moral theory and practice.Mark Rowlands - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Wild Fish and Expected Utility.Bob Fischer - 2017 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):1-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-05

Downloads
31 (#501,295)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references