Sophia 55 (2):197-213 (2016)

Authors
Christopher Donald Cordner
University of Melbourne
Abstract
The idea of attention was brought back into mainstream philosophical thinking about ethics by Iris Murdoch, drawing on Simone Weil. While Murdoch’s use of the idea has been reflected on by a number of recent commentators, I think its deepest lessons have largely been missed. Beginning from a recurrent and revealing misreading of Murdoch on attention, a misreading often articulated through reflection on Murdoch’s example of M and D, I want to bring out some of those lessons. It is well-known that Murdoch links attention with just and loving vision. I describe a common, mistaken account of what she means by just and loving vision, and I then turn to other connotations of attention invoked by Murdoch. These other connotations are mentioned in dispatches by some commentators, but not dwelt upon. While Murdoch herself does not explore them extensively either, I argue that they are important for teasing out what matters most in Murdoch’s invocation of attention. As that way of putting suggests, my interest in Murdochian exegesis is eventually superseded by my attempts to elicit what I think to be some of the most fruitful implications of her reflections on attention.
Keywords Iris Murdoch  Attention  Seeing accurately  Loving vision  Being-present-to  Waiting-on
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11841-016-0540-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals.Iris Murdoch - 1992 - Allen Lane, Penguin Press.
Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals.Iris Murdoch - 1995 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 9 (1):78-81.
The Exploration of Moral Life.Carla Bagnoli - 2011 - In Justin Broakes (ed.), Iris Murdoch, philosopher. Oxford University Press.
Kantian Crystallization.Elijah Millgram - 2004 - Ethics 114 (3):511-513.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Moral Virtue of Being Understanding.Eva-Maria Düringer - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (4):917-932.
Emerson and the “Pale Scholar”.Reza Hosseini - 2018 - Dialogue 57 (1):115-135.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Iris Murdoch on Art, Ethics, and Attention.Anil Gomes - 2013 - British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (3):321-337.
Iris Murdoch and the Nature of Good.Elizabeth Burns - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (3):303-313.
Murdochian Moral Perception.W. Scott Clifton - 2013 - Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (3):207-220.
Iris Murdoch, Philosopher: A Collection of Essays.Christopher Cordner - 2013 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (1):142-143.
Moral Vision: Iris Murdoch and Alasdair Maclntyre. [REVIEW]Michael Schwartz - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S3):315 - 327.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-07-11

Total views
46 ( #243,846 of 2,497,999 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #140,442 of 2,497,999 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes