Discharging the moral responsibility for collective unjust enrichment in the global economy


In this article we wonder how a person can discharge the political responsibility for supporting and benefiting from unjust social structures. Firstly, we introduce the concept of structural injustice and defend it against three possible objections: ‘explanatory nationalism’, a diachronic interpretation of the benefits of industry-led growth, being part of a social structure does not automatically mean being responsible for its negative consequences. Then, we hold that both Iris Marion Young’s ‘social connection model’ and Robin Zheng’s ‘role-ideal model’ provide clear indications on how to unload responsibility for supporting/participating in unjust social structures, but fail to explain how to get rid of responsibility for unjust enrichment. We maintain that both models should be complemented with a global redistributive scheme that allows to disgorge the benefits that are unfairly obtained in the global economic system, besides undertaking collective transformative actions and assuming ideal-role responsibilities.

Download options


External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

55 (#210,433)

6 months
18 (#47,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fausto Corvino
Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant'Anna

References found in this work

Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Responsibility for Justice.Iris Marion Young - 2011 - Oxford University Press USA.
Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model.Iris Marion Young - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):102-130.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model.Iris Marion Young - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):102-130.
Iris Young, Radical Responsibility, and War.Harry van der Linden - 2014 - Radical Philosophy Review 17 (1):45-62.
What is Unjust Enrichment?Charlie Webb - 2009 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2):215-243.
Collective Responsibility and National Responsibility.Roland Pierik - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (4):465-483.
Weinrib on Unjust Enrichment.Prince Saprai - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24 (1):183-204.
Debating Collective Responsibility.Elizabeth S. Piliero - 2017 - Social Philosophy Today 33:175-186.
What Right Does Unjust Enrichment Law Protect?Jennifer M. Nadler - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (2):245-275.
The Global Consequence of Participatory Responsibility.Henning Hahn - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (1):43 – 56.