On serendipity in science: discovery at the intersection of chance and wisdom

Synthese (6):1-22 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘Serendipity’ is a category used to describe discoveries in science that occur at the intersection of chance and wisdom. In this paper, I argue for understanding serendipity in science as an emergent property of scientific discovery, describing an oblique relationship between the outcome of a discovery process and the intentions that drove it forward. The recognition of serendipity is correlated with an acknowledgment of the limits of expectations about potential sources of knowledge. I provide an analysis of serendipity in science as a defense of this definition and its implications, drawing from theoretical and empirical research on experiences of serendipity as they occur in science and elsewhere. I focus on three interrelated features of serendipity in science. First, there are variations of serendipity. The process of serendipitous discovery can be complex. Second, a valuable outcome must be obtained before reflection upon the significance of the unexpected observation or event in respect to that outcome can take place. Therefore, serendipity is retrospectively categorized. Third, the primacy of epistemic expectations is elucidated. Finally, I place this analysis within discussions in philosophy of science regarding the impact of interpersonal competition upon the number and significance of scientific discoveries. Thus, the analysis of serendipity offered in this paper contributes to discussions about the social-epistemological aspects of scientific discovery and has normative implications for the structure of epistemically effective scientific communities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Serendipity: fortune and the prepared mind.Mark de Rond & Iain Morley (eds.) - 2010 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scientific Discovery: Logic and Tinkering.Aharon Kantorovich - 1993 - State University of New York Press.
Curing cancer? Patrick Lee's path to the reovirus treatment.Paul Thagard - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (1):79 – 93.
Understanding humans: serendipity and anthropology‖.Richard Leakey - 2010 - In Mark de Rond & Iain Morley (eds.), Serendipity: Fortune and the Prepared Mind. Cambridge University Press. pp. 22--27.
5 Serendipity in astronomy.Andrew C. Fabian - 2010 - In Mark de Rond & Iain Morley (eds.), Serendipity: Fortune and the Prepared Mind. Cambridge University Press. pp. 22--73.
6 Serendipity in physics.Richard Friend - 2010 - In Mark de Rond & Iain Morley (eds.), Serendipity: Fortune and the Prepared Mind. Cambridge University Press. pp. 22--91.
1 The stratigraphy of serendipity.Susan E. Alcock - 2010 - In Mark de Rond & Iain Morley (eds.), Serendipity: Fortune and the Prepared Mind. Cambridge University Press. pp. 22--11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-16

Downloads
87 (#178,790)

6 months
17 (#107,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Strong and weak emergence.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In Philip Clayton & Paul Davies (eds.), The re-emergence of emergence: the emergentist hypothesis from science to religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Genesis and development of a scientific fact.Ludwik Fleck - 1979 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by T. J. Trenn & R. K. Merton.
The division of cognitive labor.Philip Kitcher - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5-22.
The Role of the Priority Rule in Science.Michael Strevens - 2003 - Journal of Philosophy 100 (2):55-79.

View all 30 references / Add more references