Two closely related simulations provide weak limits on residual normality

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):754-755 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas & Karmiloff- Smith correctly identify Residual Normality as a critical assumption of some theorising about mental structure within developmental psychology. However, their simulations provide only weak support for the conditions under which RN may occur because they explore closely related architectures that share a learning algorithm. It is suggested that more work is required to establish the limits of RN

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Did residual normality ever have a chance?Susan C. Levine, Terry Regier & Tracy L. Solomon - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):759-760.
The beauty of models for developmental disorders.J. Briscoe - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):750-752.
Residual normality: Friend or foe?Michael Thomas & Annette Karmiloff-Smith - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):772-780.
Evidence for a domain-specific deficit in developmental dyslexia.Franck Ramus - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):767-768.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#419,193)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references