Structured representations in the control of behavior cannot be so easily dismissed: A reply to Botvinick and Plaut (2006)

Psychological Review 113 (4):929-931 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Postscript: The way forward: Comment.Matthew M. Botvinick & David C. Plaut - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (4):928-928.
Developing structured representations.Leonidas A. A. Doumas & Lindsey E. Richland - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):384-385.
An anarchist reply to Skinner on 'weak' methods of control.Carl G. Hedman - 1974 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 17 (1-4):105 – 111.
Systematicity, structured representations and cognitive architecture: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn.Andy Clark - 1991 - In Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson (eds.), Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 198--218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?