Created for everlasting life: Can theistic evolution provide an adequate Christian account of human nature?

Zygon 48 (2):478-495 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Christians who affirm standard science and the biblical doctrine of creation often endorse theistic evolution as the best approach to human origins. But theistic evolution is ambiguous. Some versions are naturalistic (NTE)—God created humans entirely by evolution—and some are supernaturalistic (STE)—God supernaturally augmented evolution. This article claims that NTE is inadequate as an account of human origins because its theological naturalism and emergent physicalist ontology of the soul or person conflict with the Christian doctrine that God created humans for everlasting life. Both the traditional Christian account of the afterlife and its modern Christian alternatives involve God's supernatural action and a separation (dualism) of person and body at death. STE can combine with several philosophical accounts of the body-soul relation to provide an adequate Christian account of original human nature

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-29

Downloads
129 (#131,046)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Summa Theologica.Thomasn D. Aquinas - 1273 - Hayes Barton Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
The Emergent Self.William Hasker - 2001 - London: Cornell University Press.
Mind and Emergence: From Quantum to Consciousness.Philip Clayton - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Death and Eternal Life.John Hick - 1976 - London: Collins.
Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies?Nancey C. Murphy - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references