A paradox in Hempel's criterion of maximal specificity

Philosophy of Science 48 (2):327-328 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/289002

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Statistical ambiguity and maximal specificity.W. C. Humphreys - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (2):112-115.
The paradox of confirmation.Branden Fitelson - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (1):95–113.
Confirmation, paradox, and logic.Leif Eriksen - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):681-687.
Statistical Explanations.James H. Fetzer - 1972 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1972:337 - 347.
Confirmation and prediction.G. H. Merrill - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (1):98-117.
Maximal Possibilities.David Sanson - manuscript
Maximal specificity and lawlikeness in probabilistic explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (2):116-133.
Hempel's criterion of maximal specificity.Gerald J. Massey - 1968 - Philosophical Studies 19 (3):43 - 47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#516,369)

6 months
1 (#1,428,112)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems Reconstructed in Probability Semantics.Roger M. Cooke - 1986 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986 (1):409-421.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references