How Transparent is Disgust?

European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):1810-1823 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


According to the so-called transparency thesis, what is disgusting in nature cannot but be disgusting in art. This paper critically discusses the arguments that have been put forward in favour of the transparency thesis, starting with Korsmeyer's (2011) sensory view of disgust. As an alternative, it offers an account of the relationship between disgust and representation that explains, at least in part, whatever truth there is in the transparency thesis. Such an account appeals to a distinction between object-centric and situation-centric emotions.

Similar books and articles

Disgust’s Transparency.Filippo Contesi - 2016 - British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (4):347-354.
Korsmeyer on Fiction and Disgust.Filippo Contesi - 2015 - British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (1):109-116.
The Meanings of Disgusting Art.Filippo Contesi - 2016 - Essays in Philosophy 17 (1):68-94.
Savoring Disgust: The Foul and the Fair in Aesthetics. [REVIEW]Filippo Contesi - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):113-116.
Aesthetic Disgust?Jenefer Robinson - 2014 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 75:51-84.


Added to PP

769 (#21,653)

6 months
115 (#40,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Filippo Contesi
Universitat de Barcelona

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations