Development of a core outcome set for informed consent for therapy: An international key stakeholder consensus study

BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1):1-15 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Background 300 million operations and procedures are performed annually across the world, all of which require a patient’s informed consent. No standardised measure of the consent process exists in current clinical practice. We aimed to define a core outcome set for informed consent for therapy. Methods The core outcome set was developed in accordance with a predefined research protocol and the Core OutcoMes in Effectiveness Trials methodology comprising systematic review, qualitative semi structured interviews, a modified Delphi process and consensus webinars to ratify outcomes for inclusion in the final core outcome set.. Participants from all key stakeholder groups took part in the process, including patients and the public, healthcare practitioners and consent researchers. Results 36 outcome domains were synthesised through systematic review and organised into a consent taxonomy. 41 semi-structured interviews were performed with all consent stakeholders groups. 164 participants from all stakeholder groups across 8 countries completed Delphi Round 1 and 125 completed Round 2. 11 outcomes met the ‘consensus in’ criteria. 6 met ‘consensus in’ all stakeholder groups and were included directly in the final core outcome set. 5 remaining outcomes meeting ‘consensus in’ were ratified over two consensus webinars. 9 core outcomes were included in the final core outcome set: Satisfaction with the quality and amount of information, Patient feeling that there was a choice, Patient feeling that the decision to consent was their own, Confidence in the decision made, Satisfaction with communication, Trust in the clinician, Patient satisfaction with the consent process, Patient rated adequacy of time and opportunity to ask questions. Conclusion This international mixed-methods qualitative study is the first of its kind to define a core outcome set for informed consent for intervention. It defines what outcomes are of importance to key stakeholders in the consent process and is a forward step towards standardising future consent research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Informed Consent: Foundations and Applications.Joanna Smolenski - 2021 - Dissertation, Cuny Graduate Center
Informed Consent In Gerontology.Rosana Glock & Josz Goldim - 2003 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 13 (1):6-8.
Obtaining informed consent for Cesarean sections in Bangladesh.Mohammad Mahodur Rahman - 2019 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 29 (4):119-125.
Informed Consent Out of Context.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 63 (2):149-154.
Informed consent: a primer for clinical practice.Deborah Bowman - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by John Spicer & Rehana Iqbal.
Informed Consent: Good Medicine, Dangerous Side Effects.Bruce N. Waller & Robyn A. Repko - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):66-74.
Two Models of Informed Consent.Lynn A. Jansen - 2021 - Social Philosophy and Policy 38 (2):50-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-10

Downloads
10 (#1,129,009)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?