On a Puzzle About Withholding

Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):374-376 (2013)
Authors
Juan Comesaña
University of Arizona
Abstract
I discuss Turri's puzzle about withholding. I argue that attention to the way in which evidence can justify withholding dissolves the puzzle
Keywords agnosticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00105.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Puzzle About Withholding.John Turri - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):355-364.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rational Suspension.Alexandra Zinke - 2021 - Theoria 87 (5):1050-1066.
Rationality and Truth.Stewart Cohen & Juan Comesaña - forthcoming - In Julien Dutant & Fabian Dorsch (eds.), The New Evil Demon. Oxford University Press.
Can We Believe for Practical Reasons?Juan Comesaña - 2015 - Philosophical Issues 25 (1):189-207.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Puzzle About Withholding.John Turri - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):355-364.
When is Deception in Research Ethical?Nafsika Athanassoulis & James Wilson - 2009 - Clinical Ethics 4 (1):44-49.
A Simple Solution to the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever.Brian Rabern & Landon Rabern - 2008 - Analysis 68 (2):105-112.
How to Solve the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever in Two Questions.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):39-44.
A Puzzle About Warrant.Duncan Pritchard - 2001 - Philosophical Inquiry 23 (1-2):59-71.
A Pragmatic Solution to Ostertag’s Puzzle.Philip Atkins - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):359-365.
A Note on the Relationship Between Mates' Puzzle and Frege's Puzzle.M. A. Moffett - 2002 - Journal of Semantics 19 (2):159-166.
Why the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever Cannot Be Solved in Less Than Three Questions.Gregory Wheeler & Pedro Barahona - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):493-503.
Dogmatism Repuzzled.Assaf Sharon & Levi Spectre - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (2):307 - 321.
The Puzzle of Experience.Jerome J. Valberg - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Wigner’s Puzzle for Mathematical Naturalism.Sorin Bangu - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):245-263.
A Puzzle About 'Because'.Benjamin Schnieder - 2010 - Logique Et Analyse 53.
Shadows of Constitution.István Aranyosi - 2007 - The Monist 90 (3):415-431.
A Puzzle About Truth and Singular Propositions.Aviv Hoffmann - 2003 - Mind 112 (448):635-651.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-20

Total views
123 ( #96,300 of 2,519,631 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #36,310 of 2,519,631 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes



Home | New books and articles | Bibliographies | Philosophy journals | Discussions | Article Index | About PhilPapers | API | Contact us | Code of conduct

CDP Phiosophy Documentation Center
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation

Server: philpapers-web-584f896dc5-vqctr N