Ratio Juris 11 (2):180-192 (1998)
AbstractThe purpose of Aarnio and Peczenik is very ambitious: on the one hand, providing an explanatory picture of social interaction; on the other hand, offering a comprehensive conception of the best arrangement we can get of the so called Democratic Rule-of-Law State. In the paper, Comanducci first outlines some of the most important aspects of Aarnio and Peczenik work, mainly stressing the conclusions he agrees with, at the three different levels in which the authors’ discourse places itself— namely, at the meta-ethical, ethical and explanatory levels. Secondly, Comanducci advances some critical remarks regarding each of the three levels, with the aim of bringing to light a few minor deficiencies of Aarnio and Peczenik’s approach and, consequently, with the aim of strengthening their position.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Suum Cuique Tribuere. Some Reflections on Law, Freedom and Justice.Aulis Aarnio & Aleksander Peczenik - 1995 - Ratio Juris 8 (2):142-179.
On Values. Universal or Relative?Aulis Aarnio & Aleksander Peczenik - 1996 - Ratio Juris 9 (4):321-330.
Some Thoughts on Peczenik's Replies to "Jorgensen's Dilemma and How to Face It" (with Two Letters by A. Peczenik).Robert Walter - 1997 - Ratio Juris 10 (4):392-396.
Proceedings of the 21st Ivr World Congress, Lund, Sweden, 12-17 August, 2003: Justice.Aleksander Peczenik (ed.) - 2004 - Franz Steiner Verlag.
Versus Cuiusdam Ad Librum Suum Editedfrom the Ms Oxford, Bodl. Digby 65.C. H. Kneepkens - 1970 - Vivarium 8 (1):155-156.
Quantum Probabilities and the Conjunction Principle.Igor Douven & Jos Uffink - 2012 - Synthese 184 (1):109-114.
“Ars iuris” und “suum in persona ipsa” bei Hugo donellus.Heribert Waider - 1961 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 43 (1):52-69.