Who’s Afraid of Inconsistent Mathematics?

ProtoSociology 25:24-35 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary mathematical theories are generally thought to be consistent. But it hasn’t always been this way; there have been times in the history of mathematics when the consistency of various mathematical theories has been called into question. And some theories, such as naïve set theory and (arguably) the early calculus, were shown to be inconsistent. In this paper I will consider some of the philosophical issues arising from inconsistent mathematical theories.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ontological commitments of inconsistent theories.Mark Colyvan - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (1):115 - 123.
An introduction to the philosophy of mathematics.Mark Colyvan - 2012 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
An Analysis of Inconsistent and Incomplete Necker Cubes.Chris Mortensen - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Logic 4:216-225.
Inconsistent theories as scientific objectives.Dilip B. Madan - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):453-470.
Towards a Philosophy of Applied Mathematics.Christopher Pincock - 2009 - In Otávio Bueno & Øystein Linnebo (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Philosophie und Mathematik. [REVIEW]Hans-Christian Reichel - 1998 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 5:432-435.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
32 (#487,332)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Colyvan
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

Why logical pluralism?Colin R. Caret - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 20):4947-4968.
Representing the World with Inconsistent Mathematics.Colin McCullough-Benner - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4):1331-1358.
The ontological commitments of inconsistent theories.Mark Colyvan - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (1):115 - 123.
Is science inconsistent?Otávio Bueno & Peter Vickers - 2014 - Synthese 191 (13):2887-2889.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references