Transmuted Expertise: How Technical Non-Experts Can Assess Experts and Expertise [Book Review]

Argumentation 25 (3):401-413 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To become an expert in a technical domain means acquiring the tacit knowledge pertaining to the relevant domain of expertise, at least, according to the programme known as “Studies of Expertise and Experience” (SEE). We know only one way to acquire tacit knowledge and that is through some form of sustained social contact with the group that has it. Those who do not have such contact cannot acquire the expertise needed to make technical judgments. They can, however, use social expertise to judge between experts or expert claims. Where social expertise is used to make technical judgments we refer to it as “transmuted expertise”. The various kinds of transmuted expertise are described and analysed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is an expert?Bruce D. Weinstein - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1).
The possibility of ethical expertise.Bruce D. Weinstein - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1):1-187.
Epistemological Expertise and the Problem of Epistemic Assessment.James McBain - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):125-133.
Three dimensions of expertise.Harry Collins - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):253-273.
Linguistic competence and expertise.Mark Addis - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):327-336.
Levels of immersion, tacit knowledge and expertise.Rodrigo Ribeiro - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):367-397.
Xunzi on Moral Expertise.Justin Tiwald - 2012 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (3):275-293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-22

Downloads
150 (#122,514)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Expertise revisited, Part II: Contributory expertise.Harry Collins, Robert Evans & Martin Weinel - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:103-110.
Expertise revisited, Part I—Interactional expertise.Harry Collins & Robert Evans - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:113-123.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Rethinking Expertise.Harry Collins & Robert Evans - 2007 - University of Chicago Press.
Experts: Which ones should you trust?Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):85-110.
Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments From Authority.Douglas Neil Walton - 1997 - University Park, PA, USA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references