Mind 116 (464):805-850 (2007)

Abstract
Much of the best contemporary work in the philosophy of language and content makes appeal to the theories developed in generative syntax. In particular, there is a presumption that—at some level and in some way—the structures provided by syntactic theory mesh with or support our conception of content/linguistic meaning as grounded in our first-person understanding of our communicative speech acts. This paper will suggest that there is no such tight fit. Its claim will be that, if recent generative theories are on the right lines, syntactic structure provides both too much and too little to serve as the structural partner for content, at least as that notion is generally understood in philosophy. The paper will substantiate these claims by an assessment of the recent work of King, Stanley, and others
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzm805
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Noam Chomsky - 1965 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 110 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Know-How as Competence. A Rylean Responsibilist Account.David Lowenstein - 2017 - Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Semantics and Metasemantics in the Context of Generative Grammar.Seth Yalcin - 2014 - In Alexis Burgess & Brett Sherman (eds.), Metasemantics: New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning. Oxford University Press. pp. 17-54.
On Fineness of Grain.Jeffrey C. King - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):763-781.

View all 48 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Lambda Grammars and the Syntax-Semantics Interface.Reinhard Muskens - 2001 - In Robert Van Rooij & Martin Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Amsterdam Colloquium. Amsterdam: ILLC. pp. 150-155.
What's Wrong with the Syntactic Theory of Mind.M. Frances Egan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (December):664-74.
Narrow Content Meets Fat Syntax.Stephen P. Stich - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
The Perils of Content.John Collins - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):259-289.
Thought and Syntax.William E. Seager - 1992 - Philosophy of Science Association 1992:481-491.
The Emergence of Syntactic Structure.Marcus Kracht - 2007 - Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (1):47 - 95.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
144 ( #81,263 of 2,506,348 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,990 of 2,506,348 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes