“Science in a Democracy”: The Contested Status of Vaccination in the Progressive Era and the 1920s

Isis 96 (2):167-191 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the first decades of the twentieth century, a heterogeneous assortment of groups and individuals articulated scientific, political, and philosophical objections to vaccination. They engaged in an ongoing battle for public opinion with medical and scientific elites, who responded with their own counterpropaganda. These ideological struggles reflected fear that scientific advances were being put to coercive uses and that institutions of the state and civil society were increasingly expanding into previously private realms of decision making, especially child rearing. This essay analyzes the motivations and tactics of antivaccination activists and situates their actions within the scientific and social climate of the Progressive Era and the 1920s. Their actions reveal how citizens of varied ideological persuasions, activists and nonactivists alike, viewed scientific knowledge during a period of swift and unsettling change, when the application of biologic products seemed to hold peril as well as promise.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The costs of being a restless intellect: Julian Huxley's popular and scientific career in the 1920s.Steindór J. Erlingsson - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (2):101-108.
The scientific claims of British child guidance, 1918–45.John Stewart - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Science 42 (3):407-432.
answering Some Objections To Scientific Realism.S. Hood - 2002 - Florida Philosophical Review 2 (2):73-83.
Some second thoughts on progressivism and rights.Eldon J. Eisenach - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):196-219.
Science, Objectivity, and Progress.Valentin Karpovitch - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 43:89-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
14 (#968,362)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Are there different spheres of conscience?Erica J. Sutton & Ross E. G. Upshur - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):338-343.
Resister’s logic: the anti-vaccination arguments of Alfred Russel Wallace and their role in the debates over compulsory vaccination in England, 1870–1907.Martin Fichman & Jennifer E. Keelan - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):585-607.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references