New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review System [Book Review]
Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (3):322-341 (1991)
Abstract |
Peer review of grant applications, it has been suggested, might be distorted by what is popularly termed old boyism, cronyism, or particularism. We argue that the existing debate emphasizes the more uninteresting aspects of the peer review system and that the operation of old boyism, as currently understood would have little effect on the overall direction of science. We identify a phenomenon of cognitive particularism, which we consider to be more important than the institutional cronyism analyzed in previous studies. We illustrate with material drawn from observation of grant-awarding commit tees of the Science and Engineering Research CounciL In the concluding discussion, we explore some of the possible implications for the peer review system.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1177/016224399101600303 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and Social Imagery.David Bloor - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (2):195-199.
The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences.Richard Whitley - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism.Harry M. Collins - 1981 - Social Studies of Science 11:3-10.
Funding Science: The Real Defects of Peer Review and An Alternative To It. [REVIEW]Rustum Roy - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (3):73-81.
First Comprehensive Survey of NSF Applicants Focuses on Their Concerns About Proposal Review. [REVIEW]Jim McCullough - 1989 - Science, Technology and Human Values 14 (1):78-88.
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang & Blaise Cronin - 2013 - Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1):2-17.
Unconceived Alternatives and Conservatism in Science: The Impact of Professionalization, Peer-Review, and Big Science.P. Kyle Stanford - 2015 - Synthese:1-18.
Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-Making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants.Lambros Roumbanis - 2019 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 44 (6):994-1019.
Fairness as Appropriateness: Negotiating Epistemological Differences in Peer Review.Joshua Guetzkow, Michèle Lamont & Grégoire Mallard - 2009 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 34 (5):573-606.
View all 18 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
The Principles and Practices of Peer Review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Advances in Peer Review Research: An Introduction.Arthur E. Stamps Iii - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):3-10.
Peer-to-Peer Review and the Future of Scholarly Authority.Kathleen Fitzpatrick - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (3):161-179.
Peer Review: Selecting the Best Science. [REVIEW]Wendy Baldwin & Belinda Seto - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):11-17.
A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.Mehdi Dadkhah, Mohsen Kahani & Glenn Borchardt - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1603-1610.
The Ethics of Peer Review in Bioethics.David Wendler & Franklin Miller - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):697-701.
Peer-Review and Patents: Why the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg is a Red Herring.Sivaramjani Thambisetty & Kartik Kumaramangalam - unknown
Understanding Peer to Peer as a Relational Dynamics.Michel Bauwens - 2011 - International Review of Information Ethics 15:41-51.
It Is Time to Re-Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research.Rajat Bhattacharya & Lee M. Ellis - 2018 - Bioessays 40 (1):1700185.
Should Authors Be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?Aceil Al-Khatib & Jaime Teixeira da Silva - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):275-285.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-11-26
Total views
6 ( #1,133,362 of 2,506,511 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,244 of 2,506,511 )
2020-11-26
Total views
6 ( #1,133,362 of 2,506,511 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,244 of 2,506,511 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads