Desire, Discipline, and Happiness

Philosophy Study 3 (1) (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper develops an Augustinian response to political problems diagnosed by Michel Foucault’s analysis of modern power. Foucault argues that power in the modern age is not repressive but creative. Instead of prohibiting acts, political power disciplines and normalizes subjects. Foucault’s alternative consists in practices of aesthetic self-creation not linked to transcendent or natural order. Within Augustine’s account of the purposive nature of love and desire, however, lies an implicit critique of Foucault’s ethic of aesthetic self-creation. Augustine’s eudaimonism allows him to resist the process of normalization. Augustine provides an alternative to both modern political practice and a Foucauldian practice of aesthetic self-creation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Self, Ethics and Power: Depth in Augustine, Foucault and Merleau Ponty.Romand Coles - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Playing games/playing us: Foucault on sadomasochism.Bob Plant - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (5):531-561.
Between governance and discipline: The law and Michel Foucault.Tadros Victor - 1998 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (1):75-103.
Foucault between Pleasure and Desire.Peter Klepec - 2009 - Filozofski Vestnik 30 (1):47 - +.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-06

Downloads
3 (#1,519,925)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references