Bayesian cognitive science, predictive brains, and the nativism debate

Synthese:1-22 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The rise of Bayesianism in cognitive science promises to shape the debate between nativists and empiricists into more productive forms—or so have claimed several philosophers and cognitive scientists. The present paper explicates this claim, distinguishing different ways of understanding it. After clarifying what is at stake in the controversy between nativists and empiricists, and what is involved in current Bayesian cognitive science, the paper argues that Bayesianism offers not a vindication of either nativism or empiricism, but one way to talk precisely and transparently about the kinds of mechanisms and representations underlying the acquisition of psychological traits without a commitment to an innate language of thought.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defense of nativism.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):693-718.
Nativism in cognitive science.Richard Samuels - 2002 - Mind and Language 17 (3):233-65.
Bayesian Cognitive Science, Unification, and Explanation.Stephan Hartmann & Matteo Colombo - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (2).
What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered.Fiona Cowie - 1998 - Oxford University Press USA.
The Concept of Modularity in Cognitive Science.Amol Ramesh Sarva - 2003 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Induction and Rational Belief: Naturalizing Bayesian Personalism.David Allen Youkey - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
Bayesian models and simulations in cognitive science.Giuseppe Boccignone & Roberto Cordeschi - 2007 - Workshop Models and Simulations 2, Tillburg, NL.
The case for linguistic nativism.Robert J. Matthews - 2006 - In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Why Cognitive Science Needs Philosophy and Vice Versa.Paul Thagard - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2):237-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-22

Downloads
57 (#209,557)

6 months
5 (#154,686)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?