Adaptive diversity and misbelief

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):516 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although it makes some progress, McKay & Dennett's (M&D's) proposal is limited because (1) the argument for adaptive misbelief is not new, (2) arguments overextend the evidence provided, and (3) the alleged sufficient conditions are not as prohibitive as suggested. We offer alternative perspectives and evidence, including individual differences research, indicating that adaptive misbeliefs are likely much more widespread than implied.

Similar books and articles

The evolution of misbelief.Ryan McKay & Daniel Dennett - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):493.
Adaptive misbelief or judicious pragmatic acceptance?Keith Frankish - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):520.
10,000 Just so stories can't all be wrong.Gary F. Marcus - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):529-529.
Adaptive diversity and misbelief1.Edward T. Cokelya & Adam Feltzb - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):6.
It is likely misbelief never has a function.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):529-530.
Misbelief and the neglect of environmental context.David Dunning - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):517-518.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-31

Downloads
407 (#27,638)

6 months
71 (#15,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adam Feltz
Michigan Technological University

Citations of this work

Heuristics and Life-Sustaining Treatments.Adam Feltz & Stephanie Samayoa - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (4):443-455.

Add more citations