The psychiatric hegemon and the limits of resistance

Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 23 (3):301-303 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To consider power as not only the direct physical oppression of others, but as a production of authority through discursive knowledge and a claimed ‘expertise’ of the world, has been one of Foucault’s great legacies to critical work on mental health and illness. As arbiters of the ‘truth’ on what is and what is not mental pathology, I agree with Swerdfager that the privileged knowledge of the mental health professions and the consequential marginalization of other forms of knowledge on distress can be better theorized through an investigation of the power/knowledge nexus. Practically, scholars and researchers can begin to address these...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Politics and mental health.Thomas Swerdfager - 2016 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 23 (3):309-311.
The Cost of Treating Knowledge as a Mental State.Martin Smith - 2017 - In A. Carter, E. Gordon & B. Jarvis (eds.), Knowledge First Approaches to Epistemology and Mind. Oxford University Press. pp. 95-112.
Values and psychiatric diagnosis.John Z. Sadler - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Bio-Somatic-Power.Ian Tucker - 2011 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 13 (1):82-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
24 (#637,523)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references