Journal of Business Ethics 97 (4):563-579 (2010)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This paper argues that Rawls’ principles of justice provide a normative foundation for stakeholder theory. The principles articulate (at an abstract level) citizens’ rights; these rights create interests across all aspects of society, including in the space of economic activity; and therefore, stakeholders – as citizens – have legitimate interests in the space of economic activity. This approach to stakeholder theory suggests a political interpretation of Boatright’s Moral Market approach, one that emphasizes the rights/place of citizens. And this approach to stakeholder theory – in terms of citizens – raises a further question, what rights and obligations do economic agents have, beyond those attached to their roles as citizens? Rawls would reject additional rights and obligations of this sort for two reasons, one tied to freedom and one tied to pluralism. Rawls’ work therefore presses us to re-conceptualize the place of ethical claims in the economic context.
|
Keywords | Rawls stakeholder theory (normative foundations) social contract theory Moral Markets approach organizational ethics |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s10551-010-0525-y |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Law of Peoples: With, The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions.R. Edward Freeman - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
View all 24 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
There Is No Rawlsian Theory of Corporate Governance.Abraham Singer - 2015 - Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (1):65-92.
Rawlsian Institutionalism and Business Ethics: Does It Matter Whether Corporations Are Part of the Basic Structure of Society?Brian Berkey - 2021 - Business Ethics Quarterly 31 (2):179-209.
Leaving the Road to Abilene: A Pragmatic Approach to Addressing the Normative Paradox of Responsible Management Education.Dirk C. Moosmayer, Sandra Waddock, Long Wang, Matthias P. Hühn, Claus Dierksmeier & Christopher Gohl - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 157 (4):913-932.
Do LGBT Workplace Diversity Policies Create Value for Firms?Mohammed Hossain, Muhammad Atif, Ammad Ahmed & Lokman Mia - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 167 (4):775-791.
Rethinking the Very Idea of Egalitarian Markets and Corporations: Why Relationships Might Matter More Than Distribution.Pierre-Yves Néron - 2015 - Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (1):93-124.
View all 10 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Japanese Moralogy as Business Ethics.Iwao Taka & Thomas W. Dunfee - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (5):507-519.
Background Environmental Justice: An Extension of Rawls's Political Liberalism.Edward Abplanalp - unknown
Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness.Robert A. Phillips - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (1):51-66.
The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory.Alan Strudler - 2002 - Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2):215-233.
Normative Stakeholder Theory and Aristotle: The Link Between Ethics and Politics. [REVIEW]Nachoem M. Wijnberg - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 25 (4):329 - 342.
Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory.Craig P. Dunn - 1996 - Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (2):133-147.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-07-03
Total views
92 ( #125,270 of 2,498,536 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #282,166 of 2,498,536 )
2010-07-03
Total views
92 ( #125,270 of 2,498,536 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #282,166 of 2,498,536 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads