Sovereignty, the Corporate Religious, and Jurisdictional/political Pluralism

Theoretical Inquiries in Law 18 (2):547-575 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We typically associate sovereignty with the modern state and presuppose the coincidence of political rule, public power, government, legitimacy and jurisdiction with territorially delimited states. We are also used to referencing liberal principles of justice, egalitarian ideals of fairness, republican conceptions of non-domination and separation of powers, and democratic ideas of popular sovereignty, for the standards that should constitute, guide, limit and legitimate the exercise of sovereign power. This Article addresses an important challenge to these principles: the reemergence of theories and claims to jurisdictional/political pluralism on behalf of non-state “nomos groups” within well-established liberal-democratic polities. Theories of jurisdictional political pluralism purport to account for the independent sovereign authority of the corporate religious, while providing a “postmodern,” “permeable,” “pluralist” conception of sovereignty allegedly more appropriate descriptively to twenty-first century reality and more attractive normatively, than the modern statist version. This Article analyzes and assesses these claims. It criticizes the disassociation of the sovereignty concept from publicly accountable power, challenges the displacement of rights-holders from individuals to corporate groups, and offers a different, federal alternative to anachronistic or normatively flawed modern monistic statist conceptions. My purpose is to preserve the key achievements of democratic constitutionalism and to apply them to every level on which government, power, rule, and/or domination is exercised.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The fact of pluralism and israeli national identity.Rebecca Kook - 1998 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (6):1-24.
Strong popular sovereignty and constitutional legitimacy.George Duke - 2017 - European Journal of Political Theory 19 (3):354-374.
Sovereign Jurisdiction, Territorial Rights, and Membership in Hobbes.Arash Abizadeh - 2016 - In A. Martinich & Kinch Hoekstra (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Modern Pluralism: Anglo-American Debates Since 1880.Mark Bevir (ed.) - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Law and sovereignty.Pavlos Eleftheriadis - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (5):535-569.
The Logic of Freedom and Power.Timothy Endicott - 2010 - In Samantha Besson & John Tasioulas (eds.), The philosophy of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 245-259.
Sovereignty, Knowledge, Law.Panu Minkkinen - 2009 - Routledge-Cavendish.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-14

Downloads
10 (#1,217,101)

6 months
1 (#1,508,101)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Pluralism and the authority of groups to discriminate.Avigail Eisenberg - 2021 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 24 (6):909-930.
On Liberalism’s Religion.Jean L. Cohen - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (1):48-67.
Pluralism and the authority of groups to discriminate.Avigail Eisenberg - 2021 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 24 (6):909-930.
OnLiberalism’s Religion.Jean L. Cohen - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (1):48-67.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references