Rex Aut Lex

Apeiron 29 (2):145 - 161 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Compares the differing answers as to whether human rulers or the law should be supreme in the works of Plato and Aristotle

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

God and the natural law: a rereading of Thomas Aquinas.Fulvio Di Blasi - 2006 - South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine's Press.
Lex orandi ast Lex credendi.Richard N. Boyd - 1985 - In P. M. Churchland & C. A. Hooker (eds.), Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism. University of Chicago Press.
Uniqueness of simultaneity.Domenico Giulini - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):651-670.
Trial by slogan: Natural law and Lex iniusta non est Lex.S. J. - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):433-449.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
36 (#434,037)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Cohen
Bates College

Citations of this work

Rules for rulers: Plato’s criticism of law in the Politicus.Huw Duffy - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (6):1053-1070.
Platonic Rule: Fiat or Law.Robert W. Hall - 2001 - Polis 18 (1-2):107-116.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references