Populism and the Politics of Resentment

Jus Cogens 1 (1):5-39 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that understanding the dangers and risks of authoritarian populism in consolidated constitutional democracies requires analysis of the forms of pluralism and status anxieties that emerge in civil and economic society, in a context of profound political, socioeconomic, and cultural change. This paper has two basic theses. The first is that when societies become deeply divided, and segmental pluralism maps onto affective party political polarization, generalized social solidarity is imperiled, as is commitment to democratic norms, social justice, and liberal democratic constitutionalism. The second, is that populist political entrepreneurs excel in fomenting social antagonisms by framing shifts in the forms of social pluralism in ways that foster deep political polarization, generalized distrust and a politics of resentment against “elites,” “the establishment,” “the oligarchy,” and “outsiders.” Why populist offers resonate requires a social theoretical analysis of status/solidarity and class issues and a direct response to them. I draw on Polanyi and Habermas to develop an explanatory approach to the current crisis and the populist responses it triggers. I navigate between two inadequate approaches: that of the Hofstadter consensus school which construes status concerns and populism as retrograde, anti-modern, paranoid and meriting no direct response; and that of the neo-Marxist tradition that acknowledges the mobilizing power of “cultural factors” and status anxieties but deems them to be epiphenomena of the deeper story of economic distributive injustice. I reject this assessment and seek to take up the status/solidarity issues in ways that take them seriously, challenge populist framing and provide alternative direct responses to them. I reject the narrative frames of left populists who foment polarization and I try to present an alternative narrative framing for a future democratic politics that draws on the best in politically liberal, constitutionalist, democratic, and socialist traditions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Collective Resentment.Katie Stockdale - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (3):501-521.
What can we hold against populism?Fabio Wolkenstein - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (2):111-129.
De halve waarheid van het populisme.Bert Roermund - 2011 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 40 (2):118-130.
Virtues of Resentment.Rae Langton - 2001 - Utilitas 13 (2):255.
Education and the Politics of Envy.John Ahier & John Beck - 2003 - British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (4):320 - 343.
Arendt on Resentment: Articulating Intersubjectivity.Grace Hunt - 2015 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 29 (3):283-290.
Rearticulating Contemporary Populism.Michael Bray - 2015 - Historical Materialism 23 (3):27-64.
The Happy Gardener: on populism, democracy and specters.Julián A. Melo - 2013 - Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 2 (2):21-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-11

Downloads
68 (#227,411)

6 months
16 (#127,921)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Hollow parties and their movement-ization: The populist conundrum.Jean L. Cohen - 2019 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (9-10):1084-1105.
Populism in power and its hybridizations.Paula Diehl - forthcoming - Philosophy and Social Criticism.
Legitimacy crises in embedded democracies.Benjamin M. Studebaker - 2023 - Contemporary Political Theory 22 (2):230-250.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts.W. B. Gallie - 1956 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1):167-198.
On Populist Reason.Ernesto Laclau - 2006 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 68 (4):832-835.
The Concept of Representation.Hanna Fenichel Pitkin (ed.) - 1967 - University of California Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references