International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):291-326 (2003)
AbstractThis essay discusses the question of whether hunting is a competitive sport. The discussion approaches this issue from several angles. The author asserts that there is an anthropomorphic fallacy that the “superiority” of human beings justifies the “right” to exploit animals. The discussion turns to an historical analysis of how hunting emerged as a “sport.” The author discusses evolving standards of what constitutes acceptable forms of amusement, and the basis of moral criticisms of hunting. The author then claims that the techniques commonly employed in hunting constitute animal cruelty. As a further analysis, the author points out a series of asymmetries between competitive sports and hunting, including the claim that sports are structured around and indeed constituted by a set of rules, in contrast to hunting. The essay then discusses wildlife management and distinguishes that from hunting
Similar books and articles
On the Moral Distinctiveness of Sport Hunting.Charles J. List - 2004 - Environmental Ethics 26 (2):155-169.
Sport Hunting, Eudaimonia, and Tragic Wisdom.James A. Tantillo - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):101-112.
The Virtues of Hunting: A Reply to Jensen.Robert Lovering - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):68-76.
Environmental Ethics and the Case for Hunting.Roger J. H. King - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (1):59-85.
Contemplating the Interests of Fish: The Angler’s Challenge.A. Dionys de Leeuw - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (4):373-390.
Game Birds: The Ethics of Shooting Birds for Sport.Rebekah Humphreys - 2010 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (1):52 – 65.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Considerations on the Morality of Meat Consumption: Hunted-Game Versus Farm-Raised Animals.Donald W. Bruckner - 2007 - Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (2):311–330.
References found in this work
No references found.