Counterfactuals of divine freedom

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (3):185-205 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contrary to the commonly held position of Luis de Molina, Thomas Flint and others, I argue that counterfactuals of divine freedom are pre-volitional for God within the Molinist framework. That is, CDFs are not true even partly in virtue of some act of God’s will. As a result, I argue that the Molinist God fails to satisfy an epistemic openness requirement for rational deliberation, and thus she cannot rationally deliberate about which world to actualize.

Similar books and articles

Molinism and Supercomprehension: Grounding Counterfactual Truth.John David Laing - 2000 - Dissertation, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
Best feasible worlds: divine freedom and Leibniz’s Lapse.Justin Mooney - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (3):219-229.
Molinism and Theological Compatibilism.Christoph Jäger - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (1):71-92.
Conditionals of Freedom as Bivalent: A Defense of Middle Knowledge.Dean Allan Kowalski - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Reconciling Omniscience and Freedom: Ockhamist and Molinist Strategies.Mark Daniel Linville - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
On Behalf of Maverick Molinism.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (3):348-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-22

Downloads
826 (#17,306)

6 months
133 (#23,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yishai Cohen
University of Southern Maine

Citations of this work

If Molinism is true, what can you do?Andrew Law - forthcoming - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-16.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David K. Lewis - 1973 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life.Derk Pereboom - 2014 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829-839.
Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.Gideon Rosen - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 109-135.

View all 92 references / Add more references