Addiction, molecules and morality: Disease does not obviate responsibility

American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):21 – 23 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author comments on the article β€œThe neurobiology of addiction: Implications for voluntary control of behavior,β€˜ by S. E. Hyman. The author agrees with Hyman that debate persists whether addiction is a brain disease or a moral condition. The author states that Hyman has not fully answered the question of when addicted persons are responsible for what they do. The author also suggests that addiction is a brain disease and therapy can improve the symptoms of this life-threatening syndrome. Accession Number: 24077918; Authors: Cohen, Peter J. 1; Email Address: [email protected]; Affiliations: 1: Georgetown University Law Center; Subject: EDITORIALS; Subject: ADDICTIONS; Subject: BRAIN -- Diseases; Subject: SYNDROMES; Subject: HYMAN, S. E.; Number of Pages: 3p

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brain disease or moral condition? Wrong question.Thomas I. Cochrane - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):24 – 25.
Affective neuroscience and addiction.Louis C. Charland - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):20-21.
Addiction, responsibility and moral psychology.A. M. Viens - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):17 – 19.
Johnny Wilkinson's Addiction.Malcolm Horne - 2010 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (1):31-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
108 (#159,868)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations