In Sandrine Berges & Siani Alberto (eds.), Women Philosophers on Autonomy. London, UK: pp. 94-112 (2018)

Alan M. S. J. Coffee
King's College London
In spite of its everyday connotations, the term independence as republicans understand it is not a celebration of individualism or self-reliance but embodies an acknowledgement of the importance of personal and social relationships in people’s lives. It reflects our connectedness rather than separateness and is in this regard a relational ideal. Properly understood, independence is a useful concept in addressing a fundamental problem in social philosophy that has preoccupied theorists of relational autonomy, namely how to reconcile the idea of individual human agency with the inevitable and necessary influence of other people, both directly and indirectly. I derive my account from the work of Mary Wollstonecraft and Catharine Macaulay, whose contributions have remained largely overlooked by current republican theorists. I have three purposes in this chapter. First, I set out the relational character of independence. Secondly, I outline a republican approach to the problem of structural social threats to agency. Finally, I hope to establish the basis for a fruitful dialogue between republicans and relational autonomy theorists on the requirements and dynamics of individual agency and freedom in oppressive social situations. I identify three distinctive features of the internal logic of freedom as independence that give it a relational character: it always locates the person within a community; there is a mediating role played by the notion of arbitrariness in connecting individual and collective perspectives; a causal relationship exists linking each person’s freedom as independence such that that the dependence of one class of persons jeopardizes the independence of the whole community.
Keywords Relational Autonomy  Freedom as Independence  Freedom as Non-domination  Mary Wollstonecraft  Freedom  Republicanism  Autonomy  Feminism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government.Philip Pettit - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):415-419.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Freedom as Independence.Christian List & Laura Valentini - 2016 - Ethics 126 (4):1043–1074.
Mary Wollstonecraft, Freedom and the Enduring Power of Social Domination.Alan M. S. J. Coffee - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (2):116-135.
Is Hegel a Republican? Pippin, Recognition, and Domination in the Philosophy of Right.James Bohman - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (5):435-449.
Nurse Autonomy as Relational.Chris MacDonald - 2002 - Nursing Ethics 9 (2):194-201.
Autonomy and Chronic Impairment.Carolyn Norine Ells - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
The Logic of Freedom and Power.Timothy Endicott - 2010 - In Samantha Besson & John Tasioulas (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 245-259.


Added to PP index

Total views
217 ( #51,659 of 2,499,718 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #25,651 of 2,499,718 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes