Cocks on Dunghills – Wollstonecraft and Gouges on the Women’s Revolution

SATS 23 (2):135-152 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While many historians and philosophers have sought to understand the ‘failure’ of the French Revolution to thrive and to avoid senseless violence, very few have referred to the works of two women philosophers who diagnosed the problems as they were happening. This essay looks at how Mary Wollstonecraft and Olympe de Gouges theorised the new tyranny that grew out of the French Revolution, that of ‘petty tyrants’ who found themselves like ‘cocks on a dunghill’ able to wield a new power over those less fortunate than themselves. Both offer diagnoses and prognoses that revolve around education. Wollstonecraft argues that a revolution that is not backed by a previous education of the people is bound to result in chaos and violence. Such education, however, must be slow, and it necessitates the reform of the institutions that most shape the public’s character. A revolution, perforce, is fast, and it often takes several years, or even generations before the spirit of the reforms finds itself implemented into new institutions. Olympe de Gouges shares Wollstonecraft’s worry and she observes that the men who were once dominated quickly become tyrants themselves unless their moral character is already virtuous. But the state of being dominated leaves little room for virtue; hence, newly minted citizens need to be educated in order not to replicate the reign of tyranny onto other. Gouges suggests that the answer to the difficulty she and Wollstonecraft highlighted was to educate the people where they could be found: on the streets, or, where they could easily and willingly be gathered: in theatres. By helping organise revolutionary festivals, highlighting the ways in which citizens could be virtuous, and writing plays to awaken their virtue, and proposing a reform of the theatre, so that the production of such plays would be possible, Gouges offered a plan for the civic education of French citizens in the immediate aftermaths of the Revolution. Unfortunately, the chaos she and Wollstonecraft had sought to remedy, led by the cocks or petty tyrants, ensured that they were unable to see through their plans, with Wollstonecraft having to leave Paris and Gouges being sent to the guillotine.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Olympe de Gouges on Slavery.Elisa Orrù - 2020 - Diacronìa 2 (2):95-121.
Gouges, Olympe de.Joan Woolfrey - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft.Sandrine Berges & Alan Coffee (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
Olympe de Gouges versus Rousseau: Happiness, Primitive Societies, and the Theater.Sandrine Bergès - 2018 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4 (4):433-451.
Olympe de Gouges.Sandrine Bergès - 2022 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-07

Downloads
25 (#616,937)

6 months
17 (#141,290)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Alan M. S. J. Coffee
King's College London
Sandrine Berges
Bilkent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mary Wollstonecraft, Freedom and the Enduring Power of Social Domination.Alan M. S. J. Coffee - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (2):116-135.
The Great Dionysia and civic ideology.Simon Goldhill - 1987 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 107:58-76.
Costing Festivals and War.David M. Pritchard - 2012 - História 61 (1):18-65.

View all 7 references / Add more references