Between History and Earth System Science

Isis 113 (2):407-416 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Anthropocene is the signature concept of the new discipline of Earth System science (ESS). This essay argues that ESS is, first and foremost, a framework for interdisciplinary collaboration, and it considers the advantages and disadvantages to historians of adopting this framework. The authors conclude that the epistemological framework of ESS devalues the role of historical interpretation and evinces a self-defeating tendency toward Holocene nostalgia. A historically informed response to the present environmental crisis needs to attend to historical forces that remain invisible to ESS, such as the technological agency of nondominant actors.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Static Analysis.Fernando Vega‐Redondo - 1996 - In Fernando Vega-Redondo (ed.), Evolution, Games, and Economic Behaviour. Oxford University Press UK.
What pluralism, why pluralism, and how? A response to Charles Ess.Kei Hiruta - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):227-236.
Earth System Law.Louis J. Kotzé & Rakhyun E. Kim - 2023 - In Nathanaël Wallenhorst & Christoph Wulf (eds.), Handbook of the Anthropocene. Springer. pp. 573-578.
Kleine schriften =.Josef van Ess - 2017 - Boston: Brill. Edited by Hinrich Biesterfeldt.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-25

Downloads
32 (#685,632)

6 months
8 (#528,772)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fredrik Jonsson
Kungl Tekniska Högskolan

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations