Asymmetries in the Social Responsible Investment Agendas: From an NGO Driven World to a Stakeholders Dialogue

Philosophica 80:45-70 (2007)

NGOs have taken a dominant position in setting the agendas of Corporate Responsibility and Socially Responsible Investment matters, thereby skewing the efforts of corporates to limit negative externalities towards their own agendas. As the latter remain to a certain extent unpredictable, corporates must deal with an information asymmetry. This situation can be explained by the historically defensive nature of Corporate Responsibility codes established by companies under pressure of the NGOs. In this paper, I contend that only a new approach to Corporate Responsibility could reverse this asymmetry: one where the social responsibility matters are articulated in a political debate between all stakeholders of a company and where conflicting interests are addressed in a deliberative process. To this end, the corporate world and the NGOs need to understand the need for a larger debate that includes all relevant stakeholders defined as the Public in the sense of Dewey. Latour and the Actor-Network theory provide us with a workable framework to structure such a dialogue, where participants have the authority and legitimacy to speak for the Public.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Making Things Public.Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.) - 2005 - MIT Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Practicalities Bottleneck to Pension Fund Responsible Investment?Riikka Sievänen - 2014 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 23 (3):309-326.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions of Equity Analysts.Christian Fieseler - 2011 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 20 (2):131-147.
Profits and Principles: A Critical Discourse Analysis.Colin P. Higgins - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:130-135.
Corporate Social Responsibility in Russia: Peculiarities and Problems.Irina Soboleva - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:269-282.


Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #381,313 of 2,507,636 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,636 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes